Trying to compare only 2 variables (stereo base and focal lenght), I have made a few photos, always with the distance to the nearest object located about 3 meters (thus this third variable, the distance, (involved in the depth triangle) becoming a constant).
50% photos are shot with a stereobase of 70mm and the other half have a stereobase of 140mm. Therephore each object has 2 pics with two different stereo bases.
Of course all the photos have been edited using the latest version of SPM and the final resolution is FullHD (1920 x 1080). I have assigned to each photo the name of a Spanish city and I have uploaded all them, in alphabetical order in this album:
http://phereo.com/album/5c03c410e7e564831a0001aaMy hypothesis is that visually, looking all these photos, it is impossible to know which ones have an orthodox stereobase (50% with 7cm) and which (another 50%) have unorthodox stereobase (14cm).
If my hypothesis is confirmed, then can be proved that the excess stereobase of the current Sony Alpha rigs (mounted side-by-side), can be compensated by decreasing the lens focal length in half, as was previously commented here:
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=296&start=10That is ... I think that following two different paths: orthodox (70mm) and unorthodox (140mm) ... both results are equal because the stereobase excess can be compensated by varying the focal length.
That all may be relevant because several facts support the suitability of the current Sony cameras for s3D :
a) The performance of the last Sony Alpha models is excellent in all possible parameters of quality: : Sensor size and quality, stabilization, tilting screen and its resolution, RAW support, color depth and dynamic range, pixel sensor size in microns, number of focus points, face detection focus, eyes detection focus, continuous shoting at hight resolution, maximum light sensitivity, max ISO whitout noise, faster max shutter, AE bracketing range, viewfinder resolution, environmental sealing etc.
b) The Barry Aldous test has proven that the current Sony Alpha cams have an excellent synchronization, half millisecond or less:
http://phereo.com/album/5bcd974c8884287b4e000002c) Their prices are very affordable because they vary according to their characteristics between only 350 and 3500 euros (these latter only for very specialized professionals).
If... the only drawback is that the stereobase of the Sony Alpha is excessive (only in SBS rigs because using bottom rigs it can be under 70mm.) ..
... then it can be very interesting to see if:
d) Visually it is proved that this stereobase excess can be compensated by varying the focal length. That is ... following two different paths: orthodox (70mm) and unorthodox (140mm) ... both results are equal.