Phereo.com

It works well by Google Chrome, while it did not work for my first attempt somehow, and has never worked with IE10.
It shall be super if slideshow is provided.

Hello!

Thank you for your report, but I want to note that NVIDIA supports a 3D Vision plugin (not Phereo) and it would be best if you send this report to NVIDIA - http://www.nvidia.com/page/support.html

Thanks!

Ah, sorry, about that compatiblity report, I indended not a problem report to have you fixed, but rather information for Phereo users.

By the way, no plan of the slideshow implementation yet by the Phereo Site / Phereoshop / Android app?

information sharing for Phereo users:

web plugin stopped working by Vaio L SVL24129, after upgrading to Windows 8.1.
On the other hand, local Phereoshop Viewer keeps working.

takeru wrote:By the way, no plan of the slideshow implementation yet by the Phereo Site / Phereoshop / Android app?

Phereoshop has the support of the slideshow function which is available in full-screen viewer. As for the other clients, it is possible that this feature will appear in Android. However, I can not say when it might happen.

Thanks, yes, I can perform a slideshow by Phereoshop.
Invoking it in "All Photos", I can perform a slideshow for all of the local stereoscopic images.

However, it remains a problem - by the current Phereoshop implementation, image DBs are distributed among the PCs, and no method to consolidate them into 1 master, out of the Phereoshop web.

Once you provide an album-level export/import function, then the situation would become almost perfect.


However, thinking of many people who love to see images provided by others, it would be also great to provide slideshow function by the Phereoshop web as well...

Kiitos,

A few feedback about slideshow by my Sony Vaio L glassless stereoscopic PC:

* The phereoshop slideshow is so amazing for me to think about arranging 1 for each a room - but it shall be a problem of the DB distribution... I want you to provide a solution for us to work with multiple devices in parallel here once again.

* timing fluttering is a little bit frustrating - even having 3 secs (as default), sometimes it takes longer (rather acceptable), sometimes less than a sec (looking not really good).
It would be better to assure to keep the configured time to be displayed.

Kiitos,

takeru wrote:timing fluttering is a little bit frustrating - even having 3 secs (as default), sometimes it takes longer (rather acceptable), sometimes less than a sec (looking not really good).
It would be better to assure to keep the configured time to be displayed.

You can change the configure time using "-" or "+" buttons:

bulkinav,

Thank you for your reply.

However, you are misunderstanding my report.
I wanted to mean,

"Even though I have 3 seconds configured for the delay,
sometimes a transition takes place several seconds,
then sometimes less than a second."

I understand that sometimes it should take longer when a system is loaded,
but I do not find any reason to shorten retention time to make up the delay.

Kiitos,